Instant payouts in iGaming are no longer a future ambition. As we uncovered in Part One of this five-part SiGMA News series, players now expect real-time cash-outs to match the speed of live odds and instant deposits. However, as operators strive to meet those expectations, a key question arises. In the battle of crypto vs digital wallets in iGaming, which rails can deliver both speed and security?
It’s not just a tech race but a tug-of-war — crypto on one side, digital wallets on the other, with trust and control pulled between them.
Crypto payouts have long been positioned as the fastest route to player funds. Depending on the network, settlements can take anywhere from a few seconds to a few minutes. This puts pressure on traditional providers like PayPal, Skrill, and Visa Direct, which typically promise sub-30-minute e-wallet withdrawals and are increasingly delivering on this promise.
Yet speed alone doesn’t win loyalty. As Yaspa CTO Toby Sucharov told SiGMA News, “If you want real-time withdrawals, your fraud models need to be embedded, not bolted on. You can’t have fast without smart.”
The real question isn’t just which method is faster, but which delivers a better balance of speed, trust, and traceability. But speed comes with trade-offs, and crypto’s biggest ones aren’t technical.
From a regulatory perspective, digital wallets are more predictable. Most jurisdictions give digital wallet providers a green light. They’re licensed, traceable, and follow clear KYC and AML rules. Crypto still doesn’t get that same clarity, stuck in a legal fog that keeps shifting.
The MGA and a handful of regulators have begun cautiously opening the door to crypto integration. Others are still keeping that door closed for now. For MGA licensees, using virtual assets usually needs prior approval and full anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance.
Innokenty Isers, CEO of Paybis, told SiGMA News earlier this year: “Crypto withdrawals are gaining traction, particularly among crypto-savvy users who value quick access to their winnings. But if the user experience isn’t seamless, operators risk losing them.”
This regulatory hesitancy plays a major role in the broader contest between crypto vs digital wallets in iGaming, particularly for operators navigating multiple licensing regimes. For operators serving regulated markets, this matters. One UK-based gambling lawyer told SiGMA News that for operators in tightly regulated markets, crypto can lose its advantage once enhanced due diligence is triggered — making a trusted e-wallet the simpler option in practice. Technology aside, the real contest plays out in emotion and behaviour.
In theory, crypto offers control, instant self-custody, no intermediaries, and borderless access. In practice, uptake remains uneven. Benzinga reported the highest per-capita search interest for ‘crypto casino’ in Germany and the UK in 2025, representing the highest per-capita figures in Europe at the time.
Players crave predictability. When Jason Heller, Senior VP at 5WPR, spoke to SiGMA News about payout expectations, he noted: “It’s an emotional trigger. If you win, you expect that money right away. If you don’t get it, you leave.”
To most punters, crypto still feels speculative, a risk rather than a guarantee. Digital wallets, by contrast, evoke the assurance of cash. This offers proof that the real divide is psychological, not technical. Predictability, more than raw speed, shapes how players decide who they trust.
Operators also report higher customer service volumes for crypto payouts due to network fees, wallet address errors, or delays caused by blockchain congestion. These pain points add cost and complexity that wallets like PayPal or Skrill have already spent decades ironing out. “Stablecoins like USDT and USDC provide much-needed stability in a wildly volatile crypto market,” said Isers. “That makes them ideal for gaming, where volatility can disrupt cash flows.”
Crypto often touts its low-cost advantage, especially for cross-border payments. However, that depends on the blockchain used, network congestion, and whether the operator absorbs gas fees.
Traditional wallets and card-based solutions can carry higher fees, but they also come with dispute resolution, fraud prevention tools, and live service agreements —features that most crypto rails lack.
On average, wallet transactions cost between 1 and 3 percent per transfer. At the same time, blockchain gas fees can swing from a few cents on Tron to several dollars on Ethereum during congestion. This unpredictability keeps finance teams cautious.
As one UK-based chief technology officer (CTO) told SiGMA News, “We benchmark crypto every quarter. It’s often not cheaper once you factor in all the operational risk and manual support overhead.”
This is where crypto regains lost ground. For operators with in-house wallets or stablecoin treasuries, crypto payouts can be deeply integrated into the platform. Automation is smoother, batch payments are easier, and settlements don’t rely on third-party downtime. The same can’t always be said for digital wallets, which may still require manual approval, face delays through banking APIs, or be subject to restricted hours in some jurisdictions. For many platforms, the crypto vs digital wallets in iGaming debate hinges on this exact trade-off: integration flexibility versus institutional reliability.
Isers added: “Hybrid models offering both fiat and crypto are the sweet spot. They combine the familiarity and stability of fiat with the speed, privacy, and efficiency of crypto. That’s where we see the most long-term potential.”
Yet, as Toby Sucharov cautioned, “Payout automation only works if your compliance and affordability logic are already handled upstream. Whether crypto or fiat, if you still need a human to check a PDF, you’ve already broken the chain.”
In truth, the best operators aren’t choosing one method. They’re offering both. And they’re wrapping both inside a broader strategy of real-time settlement, automated AML, and live payout dashboards.
“Offering at least one real-time payment rail is now table stakes,” says Sucharov. “That could be Visa Direct, Trustly, or a crypto wallet, but the delivery model must be instant, and the risk model must be predictive.”
Major brands such as William Hill and LeoVegas publish clear withdrawal timeframes and provide payout-status tracking for players, with options like Visa Direct offering up to 4-hour arrival times where supported, helping build trust regardless of the method selected.
Visibility changes behaviour. When the cashier displays Visa Direct 15 minutes after a 3-minute crypto confirmation, the choice becomes rational. Real numbers build real trust.
Since 9 October 2025, SEPA Instant has been mandatory across the euro area under the EU Instant Payments Regulation (EU 2024/886) for sending instant euro credit transfers. Other measures are phased through 2027. Transfers must settle within seconds for eligible payments. In the UK, CHAPS will mandate ISO 20022 purpose codes across all payments from November 2027, setting a new baseline for transparency and interoperability across payment rails.
This increases pressure on crypto providers to compete not only on speed but also on integration, accuracy, and frictionless anti-money laundering (AML) processes.
After weighing speed, cost, and UX control, the deciding factor is often the rulebook itself. Regulation, not technology, becomes the ultimate arbiter of which payout rail wins.
It all depends on where you’re licensed. Crypto thrives in open jurisdictions like Curaçao and Nevis, while in places such as the UK or Sweden, regulatory drag keeps most operators tied to digital wallets.
However, regardless of the rails used, the real competition between crypto vs digital wallets in iGaming no longer hinges on the method. It’s about who delivers payouts instantly and reliably. It’s between operators who can offer reliable instant payouts in iGaming and those who cannot.
As the industry continues to move further into automation, the next frontier is risk mitigation. The faster the payout, the faster the fraud and the industry knows it. In part three of our SiGMA News series, we’ll examine how real-time systems are reshaping fraud prevention and what operators must build next to stay ahead.
#iGaming #InstantPayouts #Crypto #DigitalWallets #PlayerExperience #GamingTech #Innovation
Welcome to Gambling Consulting Authority (GCA) - Your Strategic Partner in Gambling Industry Advancement
