Crypto gambling regulation: Where does iGaming go next?
October 31, 2025

Crypto gambling regulation: Where does iGaming go next?

The debate over crypto gambling regulation has moved past theory. As crypto rails sink deeper into iGaming, some regulators are setting clear rules, while others still hesitate. The patchwork that follows leaves operators working in markets where reward can be tempting, yet risk is never far away.

This exclusive SiGMA News article analyses where regulation is tightening, its implications for operators, and whether crypto’s future in gambling lies in compliance or chaos.

 

Who’s setting the pace in crypto gambling regulation?

Europe moved first and fast on crypto gambling regulation. Stablecoin rules took effect on 30 June 2024. The broader MiCA regime entered into force on 30 December 2024, with a transition period ending on 1 July 2026. The result is a true EU passport for crypto services, which tightens the rails operators rely on.

Innokenty Isers, CEO of Paybis, said, “MiCA is a positive step, as it provides a clear framework across multiple member states. For operators, clarity is always preferable to uncertainty.”

In the UK, however, things remain less defined. The FCA continues to treat crypto primarily as a high-risk investment asset rather than a currency, though the regulators consulted in 2025 and plan to finalise a stablecoin framework during 2026. The Bank of England has signalled caps and a go-slow approach to protect financial stability, which will shape how quickly wallets and merchants see live use.

According to Kez Duxbury, Finance Lead at Press Box PR“The FCA continues to view crypto through an investment lens rather than as a functional currency. The challenge is logistical.”

In Malta, the MGA’s policy on DLT and virtual assets has been in place since 30 January 2023, with 2025 documents reiterating the Authority’s position and approval pathway. This aims to define how crypto could fit safely within regulated gambling.

Across the Atlantic, progress is patchy. Wyoming’s DAO and SPDI laws are permissive. New York’s BitLicense keeps entry costs high for virtual-currency activity.

 

The MiCA effect on crypto casinos

For Europe-facing operators, MiCA raises the bar on the crypto rails they use. Expect reserve rules, audit duties, and stronger consumer protections. For crypto casinos, that means more documentation and less anonymity.

While some worry it will erode crypto’s privacy appeal, others see a business opportunity. Regulated operators may soon enjoy a competitive edge over grey market rivals.

As Isers explained, “Operators who adopt a compliant framework early will find it easier to scale and secure partnerships with banks, PSPs, and suppliers.”

Most MiCA rules are already live across the EU, with a transition period still running into 2026.

 

KYC, AML, and compliance hurdles for crypto betting

Sumsub, a digital identity and compliance firm, argues that outdated KYC expectations can undermine the real-time nature of crypto transactions. As crypto gambling regulation tightens, outdated KYC slows real-time crypto flows.

“KYC used to be a box-ticking exercise, but this has not been the case for a long time. It’s now a fluid part of the player journey that needs to adapt in real time,” a Sumsub spokesperson told SiGMA News. As the EU transition winds down, expect travel-rule checks and per-transaction screening to be the norm.

Regulators are tightening AML expectations, so onboarding must keep pace. Behavioural analysis, multi-factor steps, and per-transaction checks are moving to baseline. George Pace, Senior Product Marketing Manager at SEON, echoed this: “The most pressing threats include bonus abuse, account takeovers, and chargebacks. Operators are seeing fraud rings become increasingly organised and AI-savvy.”

 

Can decentralised casinos stay legal?

Decentralised casinos are the sharpest edge of crypto gambling regulation and present the toughest compliance test. Entirely on-chain models can bypass traditional licensing, which creates user demand and regulatory concern.

Kez Duxbury pointed out the disconnect: “Crypto gambling is still a small part of what the FCA is worried about, but they’re watching. And when change comes, it often comes fast.”

Market consensus points to registration as regulated entities or restricted access to payments. The debate has moved from ‘if’ to ‘how’.

 

Regulated, rogue, or rewritten?

Crypto gambling regulation is no longer a future issue. It is a pressing concern. It’s here, uneven and evolving. Operators need cross-border strategies that bend without breaking. Regulators must keep pace with decentralised tech.

As Innokenty Isers put it, “Speed, transparency, and responsible onboarding will define the next generation of crypto gambling.”

Whether that future is led by Europe’s MiCA, the UK’s cautious adaptation, or a new hybrid framework, one thing is clear: Crypto no longer sits outside the rules.

 

Next up

If Crypto gambling regulations set the rules, what happens when privacy breaks them?

The final Part Five in this exclusive SiGMA News series steps into the grey. Players want privacy. Regulators want proof. From biometric KYC to anonymous wallets, we ask if trust and transparency can live apart.

 

If you missed the previous instalments, catch up here:

 

Dubai goes full throttle on frontier tech. AIBC Eurasia, 09–11 February 2026, gathers over 14,500 delegates across AI, blockchain, fintech, and more. Big names. Big tech. Bigger opportunities. Will you be there?

 

 

Source

 

 

#CryptoGambling #MiCA #iGaming #Blockchain #Regulation #Compliance #Fintech #GamingIndustry #CryptoRegulation #SiGMANews

Share:
News

Latest News